Why We’ll By no means Know COVID-19 Origins for Sure

China was fast to dispel reemergent COVID-19 “lab leak” theories following a Wall Road Journal report this weekend that the U.S. Division of Power has concluded, with “low confidence,” that the virus behind the pandemic more than likely originated in a Chinese language laboratory.

Mao Ning, spokesperson for China’s international affairs ministry, instructed reporters Monday that “sure events” ought to “cease smearing China” and that the “lab leak” concept has already been authoritatively disproven. “The origins-tracing of SARS-CoV-2 is about science and shouldn’t be politicized,” stated Mao. (The U.S. authorities continues to be investigating the origins of COVID-19, and each the FBI and the Power Division have decided {that a} lab leak is the more than likely supply of the virus.)

Researchers all over the world have been endeavoring because the outbreak started in 2020 to determine the provenance of the virus. Realizing how the pandemic began, consultants consider, can considerably assist the efforts to convey it to an finish—and stop future world pandemics. However three years and nearly seven million lives lost later, there’s nonetheless little certainty over whether or not the virus first naturally contaminated people at a seafood market in Wuhan, as many scientists originally believed, or escaped a laboratory, because the Power Division now reportedly believes based mostly on undisclosed new intelligence. And at this level, agree that because of the charged environment surrounding such investigations, we could by no means make sure.

“The origin probe is so politicized,” says Yanzhong Huang, a worldwide well being skilled on the Council on Overseas Relations, who notes that the revelation of the U.S. Power Division report comes as U.S.-China tensions have risen in current months. “It’s simply turning into more and more troublesome to seek out out what precisely brought on the outbreak. I might say it’s nearly not possible now, with all this delay, with the politicization of the difficulty.”

Originally of the pandemic, Republicans within the U.S., most prominently former President Donald Trump, had been fast to promote the lab leak theory, asserting that China was accountable for the outbreak. However whereas that suggestion initially appeared ideologically motivated to some—and aligned with an increase in anti-China rhetoric—there’s since been an growing acknowledgement that the idea can’t be dominated out.

“There’s not a consensus proper now within the U.S. authorities about precisely how COVID began,” Nationwide Safety Council spokesman John Kirby said in a White Home press briefing Monday. “The work continues to be ongoing. There hasn’t been a last conclusion arrived at right here. And never everybody within the intelligence group or throughout the federal government essentially has come to a consensus view right here on the way it began.”

Add to that China’s reluctance to open up its facilities and cooperate with worldwide investigators. The previous head MI6, U.Ok. international intelligence service, speculated that any direct evidence that would level to a doable lab leak would have been destroyed by Chinese language officers.

Both approach, there seemingly gained’t ever be “smoking gun proof,” says Huang. And that’s as a result of China has additionally politicized its response.

When the Australian authorities referred to as for an unbiased probe into the virus’ origins in Wuhan in 2020, China retaliated by imposing commerce sanctions on Australia’s exports. China claims its joint investigation with the World Well being Group in 2021 got here to an “authoritative conclusion” towards the lab leak concept, however the WHO itself says all hypotheses on COVID-19’s origin remain open. And when the WHO sought additional investigations, China refused to cooperate.

The issue, says Ayelet Berman, who leads the World Well being Legislation and Governance Program at Nationwide College of Singapore’s Heart for Worldwide Legislation, is that within the present political local weather, China has nothing to realize from being extra clear. And that units a harmful precedent. Berman says that analysis on future outbreaks could also be equally hampered by origin nations’ fears of dealing with financial and social backlash.

“All the different outbreaks over time—if you consider Zika, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-1, Ebola—there wasn’t actually any drawback to research the origin as a result of the nations collaborated,” Berman stated. That isn’t the case anymore. “It’s a giant drawback that must be addressed.”

Contact us at letters@time.com.